About Me

Name: Brenda Bee
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Does Mitt Romney Really Have Bragging Rights on His Veto Record?

            I have been searching a bit on FactCheck.org to get information about Mitt Romney, former Governor of Mass. after talking to my sister-in-law Georgia (Athol, Mass) about Romney as a governor. She said he vetoed a lot and it seemed like they were always fighting over something and didn’t seem to get a whole lot else done. “They”, of course was the Legislative branch and the Executive branch.       I had also read about his “I like vetoes.” advertising.

            Here in a nut shell is what FactCheck.org had to say: “It is true that Romney issued more than 800 budgetary vetoes during his 4 year tenure. However the vast majority of them were over turned by the Democratic Legislature.” and “The overrides for fiscal years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 total 707 of the more than 800 line-item vetoes that Romney issued. So while Romney did indeed veto "hundreds of spending appropriations," as he says in the ad, he had little to show for them.”

        Over 800 vetoes of which 707 were overturned. I believe I will have to agree with Georgia, Romney got very little done in his four year term, so why is he bragging about it? Or, is this another politician who seems to think he can tell the voters anything and they will gulp it down as they have always done in the past? But the past is gone, the good old days when stump speeches could be as outlandish as the politician wanted is over. We now have the internet and almost instant information to verify or dispute the claims.

             These are smart people so I am not sure why they are still using these old tactics knowing full well they will be caught exaggerating or out right lying which will turn the voters off. (Refer to my post on Newt Gingrich and his comment on the immigration bill for an example of just-this-side of outright lying. This turned me totally off of Gingrich and I truly was leaning in his direction if he had decided to run.)

           One other little detail Mr. Romney seems not to have taken into consideration when he promises to use the veto for fiscal restraint in Washington is that as Governor of Mass. he had the line-item veto. The President of the United States does not have this authority. He must accept or decline the entire budget as it is sent to him.

          “President Clinton was granted this authority by Congress in 1996, but two years later, the Supreme Court  ruled that Congress had overstepped its bounds and rescinded the president's line-item power. Efforts to grant a line-item veto in a form that might pass muster with the Court continue, but so far they have come to nothing.” (FactCheck.org)

 

         One other Republican Presidential hopeful is bragging about his vetoes. At the June 5th Republican debate, former Governor of Wisconsin Tommy Thompson stated, “….there isn’t a candidate on either side of the aisle that has had as many vetoes as I have.” This is true as far as it goes, but it too needs clarification so I hope Mr. Thompson doesn’t go down the same road Mitt Romney has chosen.

          “Thompson issued approximately 1,900 vetoes during his tenure, but  1,552 were partial vetoes. Essentially a line-item veto, the Wisconsin partial veto allows the governor to not only remove line-item expenditures, but to rewrite funding levels as well."     He also served 14 years as governor because Wisconsin has no gubernatorial term limits so had a bit more time to build his “veto” record.

                         Interesting. Verrrrrry interesting. BB

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Free to Choose; Free at Last.

        The New York Times headlines proclaim: “Justices Limit the Use of Race in School Plans for Integration”. ( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/washington/29scotus.html?th&emc=th )

        “WASHINGTON, June 28 — With competing blocs of justices claiming the mantle of Brown v. Board of Education, a bitterly divided Supreme Court declared Thursday that public school systems cannot seek to achieve or maintain integration through measures that take explicit account of a student’s race.”

         “Voting 5 to 4, the court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr invalidated programs in Seattle and metropolitan Louisville, Ky., that sought to maintain school-by-school diversity by limiting transfers on the basis of race or using race as a “tiebreaker” for admission to particular schools.”

         “Both programs had been upheld by lower federal courts and were similar to plans in place in hundreds of school districts around the country. Chief Justice Roberts said such programs were “directed only to racial balance, pure and simple,” a goal he said was forbidden by the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection.”

          “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” he said. (Roberts)” was the most profound statement made in all the yammering done by all the Justices (see excerpts of all their statements on later pages, and also see Op Ed pages for opinions).

             It has been 53 years since Brown v. Board of Education made busing children all over cities and counties to equally integrate schools. This was a necessary first step towards offering a free and equal education to both races. It was also a necessary first step towards having the races mingle and become familiar with each other. It was a necessary “first step”. It is however now time to move beyond this necessary first step and into a society where a persons civil rights are truly granted. Civil Liberty means the right to choose! That is what Martin Luther King Jr. and all the civil rights workers wanted for America: the right for all of it’s citizens to freely choose where they went to school, where they ate, where they shopped and worked and lived. The right to choose for themselves and not to be told that they had to sit in the back of the bus!

              This goal, this right of choice has been achieved. Yes, discrimination due to race still exists, but so does discrimination due to sex and weight and intelligence and every other thing one person can find to boast of over another person. Discrimination is a sad fact of life that will never disappear as long as human beings are the fallible creatures we are. But we have now gotten in place an amendment to our Constitution that makes this overt discrimination unlawful and protects the right of all people no matter their race, sex or creed. And it has been almost three generations of living together in the schools and workplaces and neighborhoods.  Now it is time to let the people have their full civil rights and choose for themselves. And since the granting of civil rights and the end of segregation began with integrating the schools this is the appropriate place for it to end.

          It was a sad fact that we had to use and abuse our children to achieve racial equality, but it had to be. The young who had not yet formed prejudices of their own and who as innocent children would reach out and not see color when they looked at a school mate, but only see a possible friend.

          There are many who will call yesterday a sad day for America and a wrong decision by the courts and the Supreme Court. There will be others like me who worked for Civil Rights most of my life who will feel the time has come to stop discriminating because of race and forcing our children to continue to be bused all over God’s half acre just to satisfy some arbitrary figure set up by the courts and the school boards to make sure there are X number of each race in every school. Yes, it is time for us in America to truly have our freedom to choose; our civil rights.  It is time for us all to be free at last.  BB

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A People Betrayed By All But Their Bitterest Enemy

        Fouad Ajami ( a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, is the author of “The Foreigner’s Gift: The Americans, the Arabs and the Iraqis in Iraq.”) explains why the experiment in a democrat and peaceful Palestinian Gaza failed, and why any other arrangement but violence and corruption will ever be had by the Palestinian people any time in the near future.  I will use many of his own words in this post because they are so poetic and yet profoundly  accessing.  He begins his essay by saying, “So the masked men of Fatah have the run of the West Bank while the masked men of Hamas have their dominion in Gaza. Some see this as a tolerable situation, maybe even an improvement, envisioning a secularist Fatah-run state living peacefully alongside Israel and a small, radical Gaza hemmed in by Israeli troops. It’s always tempting to look for salvation in disaster, but in this case it’s sheer fantasy.”

              Ajami claims that the Palestinian downfall has been a long time coming.   It has been in the making in fact for 59 years. It began May 15, 1948 when the British rule ended and they pulled out of the area known as Palestine which the United Nations had divided into two rather uneven and Gerry rigged sectioned parts of which some parcels was to be the State of Israel and the others was to belong to the Arabs. On this day the war between the new State of Israel and its Arab neighbors began and a large number of the Arabs in the Israeli sectors ran for the borders and begged sanctuary from these same Arab neighboring states.   I remember well as a child seeing in the news reels shown in the movie theaters the Israelis going thru the streets in jeeps with loud speakers asking the Arab people to remain in their homes, that this was their home just as was the Jewish peoples home.  Many Arabs stayed and tho they didn't have the full rights of citizenship as the Jewish people they had the rights of citizens to live free and own their homes and businesses.  For those who left it was another story all together.  (The history of this area is really fascinating reading. Wikipedia has a fairly good account, and knowing the history will make it easier to understand the problems between the peoples today. If you aren’t that familiar with this history please do take the time to read it sometime.)

            I agree with Ajami when he claims that “No other national movement has had the indulgence granted the Palestinians over the last half-century, and the results can be seen in the bravado and the senseless violence, in the inability of a people to come to terms with their condition and their needs.” The Israelis were condemned again and again by the United Nations which demanded more and more from the Israelis in the way of concessions to the Arab refugees and nothing from the refugees themselves.  It was only after the 1968 war that these refugees became known as the Palestinians.  Neither were the Arab  neighbors who were constantly warring against Israel sanctioned by the world body for their agression.

               The Arab neighbors for their part rather than offering the refugees sanctuary pushed them into concentration camps and used them as pawns against Israel on the world stage. The refugees leaders were no better. “…..for four decades, the vainglorious Yasir Arafat refused to tell his people the basic truths of their political life. Amid the debacles, he remained eerily joyous; he circled the globe, offering his people the false sense that they could be spared the consequences of terrible decisions.” In other words, he was a petty little man enjoying the attention of the world and had no intentions of telling his people that the Jewish state was there to stay and that they would never be able to oust them and recover the entire piece of land known as the Palestine Mandate. In fact, the Palestinian refugees as they became known would never be able to claim even the land that they had originally been given, but would have to settle for the small pieces that became know as the “Occupied Territory” after the 1968 Six Day War when the Israelis captured this last bit of territory that made up the Mandate.

          Ajami sums up Arafat’s betrayal of his people and thus their ultimate fate best when he says, “……in the late 1990s an American president, Bill Clinton, eager to redeem Palestinian claims and an Israeli soldier-statesman, Ehud Barak, who would offer the Palestinians all that Israeli political traffic could bear and then some.”

         “But it was too much to ask of Mr. Arafat to return to his people with a decent and generous compromise, to bid farewell to the legend that the Palestinians could have it all “from the river to the sea.” It was safer for him to stay with the political myths of his people than to settle down for the more difficult work of statehood and political rescue.”

          “For their part, the Arab states have only compounded the Palestinian misery. The Arab cavalry was always on the way, the Arab treasure was always a day away, and there was thus no need for the Palestinians to pay tribute to necessity. In recent years, the choice was starkly posed: it was either statehood or a starring role on Al Jazeera, and the young “boys of the stones” and their leaders opted for the latter.”

          “After Mr. Arafat’s death, the mantle passed to a fairly decent man, Mahmoud Abbas, a leader for a post-heroic era. He is free of Mr. Arafat’s megalomania, and he seemed keen to cap the volcano; he promised, as he put it, “one law, one authority, one gun” in the Palestinian street. But he has never been a master of his world; by the time he had been given his political stewardship the culture of the Palestinian world had succumbed to a terrifying cult of violence.”

        “A terrifying cult of violence”! Filled with hate and false promises and more hate over 59 years the Palestinians were doomed to failure when at last given the opportunity to form a viable state of their own.   They had no tools with which to form a state and make the compromises necessary for a people of differing views to live together.  Palestinians always cherished the belief that Palestinians would not war against other Palestinians. This belief came to an end when the two Palestinian factions, Hamas and Fatah, destroyed the dream of a Palestinian Gaza in 18 months of fighting.   No tools for compromise.......

          The Palestinian people in their misery see little difference between the two groups. Fatah under Arafat was corrupt and cruel and this legacy which lead the people to choose Hamas  in the first free election.  Hamas was able to easily win the votes because they gave the people some considerations and elemental needs such as food, water, schools, medical care. However Hamas was not willing to give up it’s sworn hatred for Israel and it’s claim to wipe Israel off the map, so the world had no choice but to continue to back and deal with the corrupt Fatah government and isolate Gaza and the Hamas government. All Hamas had to do at any time was to give up the impossible dream and deal with Israel, and they refused.

          So now Hamas has overtaken Palestinian Gaza and Fatah is in place on the still occupied West Bank. Is there any hope? Mr. Ajami doesn’t think so. The cult of violence and gunmen still hold forth as the norm in both places. He says, “There is no way that a normal world could be had in the West Bank while Gaza goes under. There is no magic wand with which this Palestinian world could be healed and taught the virtues of realism and sobriety. No international peacekeeping force can bring order to the deadly streets and alleyways of Gaza. A population armed to the teeth and long in the throes of disorder can’t be pacified by outsiders.”

         “For decades, Arab society granted the Palestinians everything and nothing at the same time. The Arab states built worlds of their own, had their own priorities, dreaded and loathed the Palestinians as outsiders and agitators, but left them to the illusion that Palestine was an all-consuming Arab concern.”

           “Now the Palestinians should know better. The center of Arab politics has shifted from the Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf, a great political windfall has come to the lands of the Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula, vast new wealth due to the recent rises in oil prices, while misery overwhelms the Palestinians. No Arabs wait for Palestine anymore; they have left the Palestinians to the ruin of their own history.” Dear Lord could a people be more used and betrayed than the Palestinians?  Betray by their leaders and their neighboring  Arabs and Muslims.

            “Arab poets used to write reverential verse in praise of the boys of the stones and the suicide bombers. Now the poetry has subsided, replaced by a silent recognition of the malady that afflicts the Palestinians. Except among the most bigoted and willful of Arabs, there is growing acknowledgment of the depth of the Palestinian crisis.”      “An Arab debt is owed the Palestinians. The gift of truth and candor as well as material help.” But will the Arab world ruled by corrupt dictators and Islamic fanatics accept their culpability in the destruction of the Palestinians and reach out a hand to help these people understand and grow beyond their divisions and violent legacy? Will the Arab world together subdue the aspirations of a radical Iran and work with the West to bring peace and stability to the entire Middle East? It is totally in the Arab states hands. No Western leader, or leaders, can bring about the changes in attitudes necessary to achieve peace in the area. Israel has long agreed that only a free Palestinian state could assure their peaceful co-existence and has been ready fopr decades now to cooperate with any plan that offers hope of fulfillment. So will the Arab States step up to the plate? Only time will tell, but hope is really slim in the minds of those most familiar with the history and the peoples thinking in the Arab world.

           Mr. Ajami’s essay ends appropriately with these words, “Palestinian society has now gone where no “peace processors” or romantic poets dare tread.”

Brothers to the Bitter End   by FOUAD AJAMI  

The New York Times  Published: June 19, 2007  http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/19/opinion/19ajami.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Lesson in an Age Old Hypocracy

 June 19, 2007 http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/06/civilization.html
Hypocrisy That Undermines Civilization
By Victor Davis Hanson

One enduring truth is that when barbaric means that destroy a culture of civilization’s trappings and rule of law in order to change from one groups having the power to govern to another groups having the power the destruction will always undermine the aggressors success. Force is never the way to make changes. In brief, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

In this essay Victor Hanson addresses this ages old lesson that has never been learned by mankind. In ages past when cultures were isolated, people illiterate and communication between groups non-existent perhaps it could be understood, if not forgiven, that groups would war against each other with violent force and destruction. But for these same practices to be taking place in the 20th. and 21st. centuries is beyond rational explanation. Stupid, unintelligent, unthinkable, obtuse are all adjectives that apply, but then in this case simply are not profound enough. And yet the practice continues to this day.

The United States and England, and a few other countries with small involvement, destroyed Iraq in order to take power from an unstable dictator, who may or may not have had ties to terrorist groups who had attacked the United States and Great Britain and most European nations. Terrorist have their roots in less stable countries in the Middle East and Asia but it was believed by our governments that Iraq was the most active supporter of terrorism. These two countries, the United States and England’s, first wave of battle was to use the air forces to destroy the infrastructure of the country before sending in the ground troops to attack the Iraqi Army. The argument would be of course that it had to be done in order to get Saddam Hussein out while saving as many lives as possible. Destroying the infrastructure of the country would immobilize Saddam’s Army. And sadly I have no doubt that in this case it was true and this mad man and dictator had to be ousted because he was a threat to world stability. Our governments, both England and the United States knew before hand that they would have to quickly replace and/or repair what had been destroyed in order to stabilize the Iraqi nation, and were prepared to do this. The re-builders were in fact following in the footsteps of the Armies. However we were not permitted to complete our mission and plans for rebuilding the country before the barbarian mentality and terrorist methods of the defeated group( the Sunnis) who were in power under Saddam in Iraq halted and destroyed any progress towards rebuilding that was being made. These Iraqi people themselves continued to destroy their own country in a deadly civil war determine to retain their power over other ethnic and religious groups in their country rather than back a combined democratic government of all the groups for the good of all the people. The most virulent group were the Sunnis who invited terrorist and Jihadist in to help them gain control of the country.

Now the Sunni have found themselves trying to exist in a cesspool of self inflicted destruction of all the necessities of a civilized life, and self incurred hatred from the other people’s in Iraq who having been made to suffer from their bombs and hatred are not ready to forgive and accept them now into the democratic process and government. The Sunni also found themselves being attacked by those they invited in as allies against their fellow countrymen. Finally realizing their mistakes they have joined forces with the United States in the western territories of Iraq to defeat and throw the terrorist from their homeland. The question is: is it too little too late? Will the other Iraqis, the Shia in the south and the Kurds in the north, share their country and oil wealth with the Sunni? The oil is primarily located in the north and the south with the poorest area being the area populated mainly by Sunnis. This remains to be seen. My guess from the past experiences with these people is that they will not accept the Sunnis, and so there will continue to be a civil war for decades waged between the groups and each side will allow terrorist from other countries back in to help defeat the other groups.

Hanson then turns his attention to the Palestinian Gaza and what is happening there now that they could possibly have had a state of their own but two different groups wanted power and the old destructive ways of terrorism were used again.

“For years Fatah and Palestinian authority-sanctioned terrorists themselves have undermined civil society by torturing, murdering, and bombing innocents. It was accepted by them that the laws of civilization--due process, exemption of civilians from attacks, and the rule of law--did not apply to Yasser Arafat's government that was as corrupt as it was savage. If you ever were in need of dialysis after you blew up the local clinic and shot the doctors, you could always cross the border to the nearby Zionist entity for treatment.”

But suddenly such Fatah terrorists are being out-terrorized by an even more barbaric Hamas, whose thugs have even looted the Nobel Peace Prize given Arafat. What barbarians! Where is the law?”

“So now the outgunned Fatah gangsters are suddenly crying about the uncivilized evils of looting, gangs, and random killings. Just as ………… (Hamas) insurrectionists destroying civil society, so Fatah once erased civilization's protocols on the presumption that no one else would dare do to them what they routinely did to others. How bizarre that Arafat's followers of all people are reduced to appealing to international norms of decency and legality to avoid their utter destruction in Gaza by Hamas.”


Hanson goes on in his article to warn other groups who are making use of terrorism and destruction to gain their means of this age old lesson. The Sunnis are now reaping what they sowed. The Palestinian people now are reaping what they have sowed.

He tells the Muslims who have fled to European countries and the United States to look and listen and learn before they travel any further down the path they have place their feet upon in the adopted countries.

“ Middle Eastern and North African Muslims flock to Europe to enjoy a chance at tolerance and freedom long denied at home. But no sooner have many arrived than they slur their adopted continent as decadent, and chose instead to live by a de facto intolerant code of Sharia Law. Only in a free West do these immigrants have the opportunity of denying the free choice of association and lifestyle to their fellow Muslims. And yet if the West were to adopt their own Middle East nihilism, it would eventually itself devolve into a Libya, Syria, or Egypt. Then disenchanted, but unrepentant Muslim immigrants would desperately search for some new West that they could once again both simultaneously enjoy and destabilize.”

Hanson reminds Mexico to “do unto others……” before they themselves fall prey to the fruits they are sowing. The Mexican economy counts on the billions sent home by the illegal aliens coming into the United States. The government has even published a comic book telling their people how best to break their and our laws and cross the borders safely. But they have the problem of immigrants crossing their southern borders from even more desperately poor countries.

“In response, Mexico's policy toward illegal immigrants on its southern border is as brutal as America's is humane. Violators are often summarily deported--if they are not first robbed by Mexican officials or beaten and killed by criminal gangs. Mexicans may lecture Americans about our purported sins in trying to secure our border, but they don't seem to care what their own government does to Guatemalans. Again, the irony arises that a government that has abandoned the rule of international law suddenly is worried that another country may be doing to it what it does to others.”


Where will it all end? When will we ever learn? BB
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palestinians of Gaza Doomed From the Start

       The two military terrorist groups in Palestinian Gaza have successfully killed the idea of any kind of peaceful co-existence with the Israelis and with each other.   I hate to have to say this but the only positive thing to come out of this is while they are busy fighting and killing each other they have taken their  full attention off of Israel.  It is sad; it is so very, very sad.  

        How can anyone in the world have expected anything else to come out of the experiment with Palestinian self rule? These people have been fed a litany of hate and violence for 59 years. This is all they know. Never, ever were they given any instruction in, or even witnessed, compromise and justice and majority rule, and especially peace where no one is fighting and killing and no bombs are going off or guns firing in the streets of their cities.  **Even their religion which is called school, fills them with hate for any but Muslims; and depending on the iman in charge the Muslims are even divided into  "us the true believers and the enemies of Allah".   So when they were given what they had been fighting for after so many years  they had no social or even humane "tools" with which to govern themselves.  Along with still continuing to lob missiles at their old enemy Israel they began fighting among themselves over who knew best what to do, or power over the rest of the people.  They simply could not break from the ridged views they were taught from infancy.

        I don’t know what will happen to these people born for nothing but killing, except to keep killing until the last one is dead. It is all so hopeless and it is a self made hopelessness. Mothers raised their sons to hate and proudly sent them into the streets to fight the Israelis. Even little boys were encouraged to throw stones at Israeli soldiers and were given guns as soon as they were big enough to carry them. Mothers raised their daughters to start producing sons as soon as nature allowed so more could be sent to kill Israelis.

        If there was ever a doomed people it is the Palestinians. And it all began when fellow Muslims in the countries they fled to when in 1948 Israel became a state, refused to allow them sanctuary, but packed them into concentration camps and kept them there in squalor for decades. So as they became more and more cramped each generation born in the camps had all humanity squeezed out of them.

         How can the world expect more from people made into beast while the world stood by and did nothing?   But then standing by and doing nothing is the way of the world isn't it?  And this attitude is blatrantly evident in the actions of the body set up to save the world: The United Nations.

** see:  http://www.triadblogs.com/BrendaFayBowers/2697/This+is+a+Saudi+textbook.+%28After+the+intolerance+was+removed.%29.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Educators Getting Back to Old Tried and True Classroom Methods

 

A must read article in today’s The New York Times ( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/16/us/16mindful.html?th&emc=th ). It is called a “new” technique of “quieting the mind” or to “induce mindful awareness. “ or “mindfulness”. It is used to help children calm down and then be able to focus their thoughts. And the only thing that is new about it is that it is now the base for a whole new department with special teachers and of course the Administration must then add directors and assistant directors to out number and guide these special teachers. (Count on it! And watch how fast Dear Terry latches onto this new angle.  Tho this may be the one and only good  department he adds to his  " More Chiefs than Indians school Administration.)

As I said, the only thing “new” about this technique is the name. If those of you who are old enough to remember before the outrageousness in education began in the 1960’s it was common for teacher to have the elementary students put their heads on their desk and turn off the lights for a period of calm and quiet. This was done at least once a day and sometimes more if the day was exceptionally stressful as on testing days or before holidays.

At any rate, for you who came up after the 1950’s it is a good read and a very informative read because it works, it’s simple and anyone can do it. Even the many so-called ADA students can and do benefit thop they may not have the patience to last thru the time period without special urging.

PS.:  I used as my title that educators may be getting back to the old fashioned ways that worked because while teaching methodology classes and seminars I encouraged my students to use the old head on the desk quiet time in their classes and had a few Administrators( those who have had very little or no time in the classroom but know all about it from reading the books written by other administrators!) call me down for that archaic nonsense as it merely represses the children’s enthusiasm for learning.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Take Another Turn at the Pork Banquet and Republican Squeal

          Headline:  “House Passes Security Bill That President Opposes”

The Democrats are at it again with the pushing of pork onto bills. This time it is the homeland security bill that is needed and is being exploited because it is needed. The bill was passed in the House by a margin of 268 to 150. “ It calls for $2.1 billion in spending, or 6 percent, above the president’s request and 14 percent more than in the current fiscal year.” And I for one have no doubt as to where that extra 6 per cent is going. Do you? Yes indeed just like all the other necessary spending bills the extra is going for earmarks (pork by another name). The Democrats however are trying to get around the recently passed ethics requirement that the names of the sponsors of ear marks be included. The NYT report says “ The House bill, brought up for debate on Tuesday, was stalled by Republican amendments designed to protest the Democrats’ decision not to disclose in the bill legislators’ favorite spending provisions, or earmarks.” (In all honesty I feel it necessary to say that this is the least of the Republicans objection to the bill although it is the greatest for me personally!)

A few more Republican concerns about the bill: 1) “Perhaps the most hotly contested part of the bill is a requirement that department contractors pay their employees at least the local prevailing wage. The provision, part of broader Democratic efforts to enact legislation being pushed by unions, would allow the president to waive so-called Davis-Bacon restrictions only in times of national emergency.” This adds millions if not billions to the cost of a project because some areas of the country the Unions demand $25 an hour for common laborers wages. It is silly and only pandering to the Unions which in my opinion have outlived their usefulness and like all things that were once good and once needed they have gone too far in their demands. This is why the Unions are losing members all over the country and having difficulties attracting younger members.

2) Republicans also “objected to restrictions imposed on the $1 billion allocated to constructing a fence along the Mexican border. Before the money could be allocated, under the Democrats’ plan, communities in the area would have to be consulted.” Not sure this is an issue as most communities along the border are fed up with the influx of immigrants. The only objection the communities would have would be the possibility of cutting off their access to water from the Rio Grande which so many of them depend on. This however could certainly be worked out with the simple use of heavily guarded viaducts.

The New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/16/washington/16homeland.html?th&emc=th

 

 

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »