About Me

Name: Brenda Bee
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

King Coal, King Makers and King Filth

 

Headline:  KING COAL, What It Costs Us

By Jeff Goodell            Sunday, August 26, 2007; Page B01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/24/AR2007082401206.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter

This is an excellent article on the REAL cost of coal to our nation. Of course being a West Virginian I got up close and personal with coal and it’s cost in human lives, pollution of the atmosphere and the raping of the Earth at a very young age. I witnessed communities burying their men year after year, and yet the men still went back down in the holes because there was nothing else for them to do if they wanted to feed their families.


Sometimes if the mine disaster was big enough or sensational enough the story would get national coverage, but only for a few days and then the nation moved on and continued to use and demand more and more of the electricity generated in our power plants. Today more than one half the electricity used in the world is from coal fueled power plants. And of course we
Americans use more electricity than the next ten advanced countries put together. We alone burn more than a billion tons of coal each year!


I looked for but could not find data on the number of miners killed each year in mining related accidents, nor could I find data on the numbers of people, miners and their families and others living near coal fueled power plants, who die each year because their lungs have been eaten away by coal mining and burning pollutants.
But, “According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a scientific advocacy group, annual emissions from a typical coal plant include 10,000 tons of sulfur dioxide, the major cause of acid rain; 10,200 tons of nitrogen oxide, a major contributor to smog; 500 tons of small particles, which cause lung damage and other respiratory problems; 225 pounds of arsenic; 114 pounds of lead; and many other toxic heavy metals, including 170 pounds of mercury, which can cause birth defects, brain damage and other ailments.” So much for the “clean coal” we are all hearing about.


And there won’t be any cleaner burning of coal after this next Congressional inquiry either because the money Congress will give the mine owners in tax breaks and subsidies will go to researching ways to mine the ever increasing harder to reach reserves now that the surface and strip mining has gotten all that is available without going deeper and deeper into the earth. Strip mining where the earth was stripped away from mountain sides in terraces to get to the coal because it was cheaper than building shafts. We thought this was a disaster for Appalachia, but now whole mountain tops are being stripped (or blown off) destroying the surrounding millions of acres of streams, forest and farm land. Leaving behind an uninhabitable waste land where no plants can grow and no animals can survive. The ash or sludge from a volcanic eruption can in time be rejuvenated and begin to grow plants, but there is no power of man or nature can make plant life stem from rock except eons of wear until the rock becomes soil. Appalachia which has the largest deposits of America’s coal will become this desolate horror if we continue to allow the coal interest to sell us on the idea of “clean coal” as a replacement for oil.


The reason I could not find the data is because King Coal is Big Money and Big Money talks real loud when it comes to collecting and supply correct data. A perfect example is the latest mine disaster in Utah. There will be a lot of noise and finger pointing and Senators screwing up their faces and shouting out the “tough” questions of mine owners, but behind the scenes deals will be made and nothing will be done. Deep underground mines will continue to operate as they have been for the past one hundred years. And the mine owners like Robert Murray co-owner of the Utah mine now in the news and “one of the most prominent coal barons in the United States, well known for his political connections and influence insisting that the collapse was caused by an earthquake, directly contradicting seismologists who say that their instruments clearly show that the seismic activity was the result of the collapse in the mine. It may not surprise you that Murray also believes global warming is a hoax.” Three guesses as to what story receives “official” sanction.


Good article. Read it and weep with me or hide your head in the propaganda put forward by the big money interests and call me a fool. It’s your call and your world as I am nearing the end of my time here. BB

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Patriotism a Dirty Word in America Today

Quite often I am inspired beyond a comment by other’s blogs.  This post is one of those times.  I visited http://bubbanear.blogspot.com/ Noteworthy better known as Bubba’s blog and the following is what I came away with.
*******************************************

Patriotism is simply not part of our lives anymore. First we did away with the draft which was a huge mistake.  Eight weeks of boot camp made men out of boys.  It also instilled a love of and appreciation of country.  The draft  united the population  with an identity as Americans, as veterans, as Airmen, Soldiers or Marines.  And so much more that is intangible and unexplainable but talk to any veteran and he/she will tell you there is indeed "something".

After removing the requirement for national service for young people we then took the flag, the national anthem and God from our schools.  What we have today is  a people divided and viciously attacking each other over every little social issue that comes up.  This is the result of the disconnection from the bond of being Americans.


We do as a nation look for it; we want as individuals to belong to this group called Americans who can  think and feel and believe  with the good of all as its unique characteristic, but it eludes us.  Go back and read your history books or just talk to older Americans and you will learn that the people had this “something”  during two world wars and a terrible depression.    So what happened?  Some would say Viet Nam happened.  But People 58,000 dead is a relatively small number in our history of wars.  (see: http://members.aol.com/usregistry/allwars.htm )  This was ostensibly the reason for making ours an all volunteer army and doing away with the draft.  By Dear Lord  was the price we have  paid of disconnection from our unity as Americans worth  the turmoil  and strife and discord we live with daily as a nation today.  Was it worth disbanding the one common denominator the men in our nation had one with the other?  Was it worth discontinuing the one common song and pray our children and our citizens had in our public gatherings.  I think not.


I think not because we as a people are looking to replace this connection, and looking in all the wrong places for something that had been so easily available to all with a single united service to our country, a song and a prayer.  Now we turn to gangs or clubs or associations.  None of which offer universal goals and beliefs thus leaving us with gangs and clubs and associations that are at odds with other gangs and clubs and associations.


And after 9/11 we had this spirit of oneness, this patriotism back for a short time.  It felt so good.  We were united in purpose and we looked for and found common ground in our goals to care for the wounded, the dead and dying and the grieving.   We were also united in seeking out our enemies and the perpetrators of this crime against Americans.  Then somehow we lost that spirit again.  We backed off and went about our lives; those still involved and the survivors began in-fighting over a “fitting” memorial (which hasn’t yet been built because we haven't yet been able to regain the spirit of honoring those who died over the selfish wants of the survivors and developers and politicians.)


I wonder will we ever again be a "One nation under God"?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Americans Mortgaged to the Hilt with Bankruptcy Around the Corner

Debtor Nation
The rising risks of the American Dream, on a borrowed dime

by Jonathan Shaw        Harvard Magazine July August 2007 Edition

http://www.harvardmagazine.com/2007/07/debtor-nation.html

 

Read, be warned and be frightened is my advice. What can you as an individual do about it? Get yourself out of debt and sock your money in a sock stuffed under your mattress probably is the best bet. We Americans are spenders and to be spenders we are increasingly borrowing the money we are spending. And to make matters far more disturbing, we are borrowing not from fellow Americans, but from investors abroad.

How much are we borrowing? “In 2006, the infusion of foreign cash required to close the gap between American incomes and consumption reached nearly 7 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), leaving the United States with a deficit in its current account (an annual measure of capital flows to and from the rest of the world) of more than $850 billion. In other words, the quantity of goods and services that Americans consumed last year in excess of what we produced was close to the entire annual output of Brazil.” Just for the record, Brazil is the tenth largest economy on the planet.

The mechanics of borrowing are really quite simple: the borrower is saying that while he needs to borrow money now he fully expects to be making more money in the future so that he will easily be able to pay it back. Being a debtor individual or nation is not always bad. If the money borrowed is used to enhance ones future income to cover the debt and then some there is no problem. The United States was a Debtor Nation for over a hundred years as a new and growing nation. The money was used to build infrastructure, roads, railroads, factories, ports and cities. In other words the money was invested in making the future more profitable. That does not appear to be the case today. Today’s borrowing is more and more for “consumable rather than productive goods”.

During the past six years we have borrowed between “between half a trillion and a trillion dollars a year for the past six or seven years—that in 2006, our investment balance with the rest of the world (what we pay foreign investors on their U.S. assets versus their payments to us on our investments abroad, historically nearly equal) tipped to became an outflow for the first time in more than 50 years. We are a debtor nation swiftly heading deeper into debt.” THIS then is the problem in a nutshell: our outflow is greater than our inflow and due to the nature of our spending ( last statement in paragraph above) we are not likely to have the funds to pay our indebtedness back in the future.

At the point where we are not able to repay our indebtedness who ever holds our note, or mortgage, controls us. The article relates how President Eisenhower control the actions of Great Britain in the 1950’s because the United States “owned” Great Britain due to their indebtedness to us. Does it scare you to realize that another country in the world can actually dictate the policy of the United States? I have blogged several times on how much we are becoming indebted to China folks. You might also make note of an article in today’s N&R concerning how influential Iran is becoming in Central and South America.

This is a long article but well worth your time to read. We Americans need to get some control over our own and our governments spending and do it soon before we are no longer the greatest nation on Earth. BB

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When the Chips are Down the Truth Comes Out

Have you been listening to the Democratic candidates for president on Iraq of late? I am hearing all the past rhetoric about “Bush’s War”, “Bush’s blundering” and “I voted for it before I voted against it”, but at the same time there is a faint but clear side echo of how the United States will be staying in Iraq for years before we can totally withdraw. A few times I have even felt compelled to push the replay button because I was sure I had misheard. Nope. No mistake. Democrats are now warning their supporters that although they certainly are not “staying the course” it will still be years before all American troops can be returned home from the Middle East.


I have felt all along that this presidential campaign had begun much, much too early for anyone’s sanity and in the case of the Democratic candidates this seems to be the case. They are now losing it entirely and beginning to sound like Republicans!

Here is what some of them are saying according to the unabashedly liberal New York Times is saying about the candidates positions: “John Edwards, the former North Carolina senator, would keep troops in the region to intervene in an Iraqi genocide and be prepared for military action if violence spills into other countries. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York would leave residual forces to fight terrorism and to stabilize the Kurdish region in the north. And Senator Barack Obama of Illinois would leave a military presence of as-yet unspecified size in Iraq to provide security for American personnel, fight terrorism and train Iraqis.”


“Senator
Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, who has proposed setting up separate regions for the three major ethnic and religious groups in Iraq until a stable central government is established before removing most American troops.”, and finally the only one holding the line is Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico who has said he would even leave some military equipment behind to expedite the troop withdrawal. At the YearlyKops convention last week he said, “I have a one-point plan to get out of Iraq: Get out! Get out!”


Just one more thought: Now that the Democratic candidates for president are changing their tune on the war I wonder what their ardent followers are going to do with all the “Bring Our Troops Home NOW!” posters? BB

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/us/politics/12dems.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's Tme for Congress to Shake Hands and Come Out Fighting the Enemy.

Headlines: “Bipartisanship is good for both sides”

Princeton dean critiques Times Op-Ed on wartime Democrats.

By Anne-Marie Slaughter August 9, 2007

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-slaughter9aug09,0,2060608.story?coll=la-opinion-center

   
I found this an interesting article on the need for bipartisanship in Washington as the only way for us to get out of the quagmire of Iraq both with some dignity for the United States and protections for the Iraqi people. This issue has divided Washington into one group screaming for withdrawal and one group remaining silent and urging that we “stay the course” while I have tried to say the answer falls somewhere in between.

Withdrawing is not the answer because a withdrawal would leave the Iraqi people stuck with the mess the BIPARTISAN UNITED STATES CONGRESS voted for and therefore created. It would also give the terrorist around the world what they would consider a huge victory that would only encourage more terrorist activities. These people can not be appeased. If we need a lesson in what happens when a country withdraws from the battlefield with terrorist we need look no further back than the Israeli and Hezballah conflict in Lebanon. Muslims around the world will be on the streets cheering the defeat of Satan America. And what is far worse is that they will believe this fallacy!

This is why I am so happy to read a moderating voice that is so much more informed and intelligent than either me or those of us who seem only to want to point fingers and shout blame with no feasible answers to the dilemma. That is what this article is: a moderating voice. I hope our leaders in Congress stop their posturing and listen. Perhaps if enough of us stop our vehement posturing and shouting we can expend this energy in writing, e-mailing or calling our Congress men and telling them to knock off the rhetoric and get this mess straightened out intelligently as a group.

One paragraph summarizes the article, “The ferocious anger felt and expressed by Yglesias and others about the stupidity, waste and danger of this war is palpable and justifiable. But the country as a whole does not have the luxury of giving in to the temporary catharsis of anger and blame-mongering. A bipartisan solution is politically risky and emotionally unsatisfactory. But it is the only way.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rude Awakening for Those Who Fled Iraq

  Headlines:  Jordan Yields Poverty and Pain for the Well-Off Fleeing Iraq

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/10/world/middleeast/10refugees.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&th&emc=th 


I found this article interesting because this is exactly the group that fled the newly formed state of Israel  in 1948.  They ran from the Jews whom they felt would brutalize them as they had brutalized the Jews,   only to find their fellow Arabs and Muslims would imprison them in concentration camps  and demand exorbitant prices for any basics going into those camps until the people were totally impoverished.   Those who could not leave due to poverty have fared well in Israel.  True, they are second class citizens without the full rights of Jewish Israelis, but they are much better off economically than they were before the mandated Jewish State of Israel was formed,  and far, far better off than those who due to their affluence were able to flee.


Israel had no need for the educated and affluent Arab/Muslims who fled their country because Jews from around the world who could afford to (educated and affluent) left the countries where they were merely tolerated and  joined in making a homeland for themselves and their children.


Iraq on the other hand very much needed the middle class to stabilize and govern their country after the ouster of Saddam.  They and their businesses  were the backbone of the Iraqi economy by offering jobs to workers,  and staffing the various institutions neccessary to a functioning society.  A stable economy and people with jobs  are far less likely to surcome to civil disorder.  These   affluent middle class people however fled their country leaving a vacuum that was quickly filled by those hungry for power and who in this effort to obtain  power are now fighting each other for supremacy making Iraq the unstable battleground that it is now instead of the secure democratized land that it could have been. 


There is a lesson to be learned here but I suspect it will never be learned man being the perverse animal he is. These affluent Arab/Muslim Iraqis fled their country just as their fellow Arab/Muslims fled  the newly created state of Israel, and for much the same reason I suspect.  The Muslims of Palestine expected poor treatment from the Israelis; the Muslim Iraqis expected poor treatment from the Americans.  Neither outcome was true of course.  However the actions of these people illustrates one basic truth of human nature:  people tend to judge others actions by those  they themselves would take if the positions were reversed.  BB

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Have We Forgotten and Lost Our Way?

I realize that my words and the words of others who love this great country can not sway those among us who hate America from their course, or influence those of you who are being lead by these haters. But please, if you have any doubt in your heart at all that all is not well with what is happening within our country today will you at least read the words of one who spent a large part of his life propagandizing in an effort to bring others to hate America? Will you spare some time to read the words of an outsider who in essence is echoing the words of our own Abraham Lincoln when he stated in 1858 that “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”?


Today’s Wall Street Journal offers the commentary of Ion Mihai Pacepa a former KGB agent as he relates how he and his cohorts in Communist Russian worked to bring America down and foster hate for Americans by other countries. They failed in their mission, but as Mr. Pacepa points out the enemy is now within and just may succeed if we are not vigilant and if we do not come together as a nation.


Just one small quote from Mr. Paceda's commentary and then I will leave you to do what you feel is right: 
“Now we are again at war. It is not the president's war. It is America's war, authorized by 296 House members and 76 Senators. I do not intend to join the armchair experts on the Iraq war. I do not know how we should handle this war, and they don't know either. But I do know that if America's political leaders, Democrat and Republican, join together as they did during World War II, America will win. Otherwise, terrorism will win. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi predicted just before being killed: "We fight today in Iraq, tomorrow in the land of the Holy Places, and after there in the West."

 

Propaganda Redux By ION MIHAI PACEPA
August 7, 2007; Page A11

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118645110306090056.html?mod=opinion&ojcontent=otep
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nuclear Shenanigans

        Every time I speak or write against nuclear power plants as the best choice for weaning us from the use of oil I get comments about how “safe” nuclear power plants are. So let me say up front : I have no concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants. I don’t care how safe or even unsafe they are. I am against them because we have yet to find a way to dispose of the spent fuel rods which will be radio active for tens of thousands of years. In other words, it is all about waste products!

         My next concern is a fairly new one and that is security in this age of terrorist roaming the Earth. We in the United States are terribly trusting and therefore terribly lax about security. (Except of course when it comes to hassling little old white ladies in airports that is!) Besides not securing our nuclear plants from serious damages that a car bomb or even a suicide bomber in the right place could inflict on our nuclear facilities, we also have many plants that actually leave barrels of spent fuel rods sitting around in the open. Yes, the “barrels” are reinforced against radioactive leakage, but they are still in the open where a bomb or bomber can get to them.

        Given these two very real concerns it is understandable that any one who values his life would not wish to live within a radius of 500 miles of a nuclear plant. I say 500 miles because I am trying to account for nuclear fall out down wind of a facility.  Of course the fallout could be nation wide if a severe storm happens to come up at the same time.

           And, because there are so many other more life friendly alternatives. Even some such as burning trash for power that manage to do away with a bad while getting a good. I won’t go into these because a lady in our Greensboro blogosphere is doing an excellent job of this right now. Diane Davis http://greensboropeerpressure.blogspot.com/ posts regularly on viable solutions to our energy problems.

           So what does the Congress of our United States allow to happen to an otherwise fairly decent energy bill? They allow “A one-sentence provision buried in the Senate’s recently passed energy bill, inserted without debate at the urging of the nuclear power industry, could make builders of new nuclear plants eligible for tens of billions of dollars in government loan guarantees.”

            Senator Pete Domenici, ranking Republican (NM) on the Senate Energy Committee and one of the nuclear industries strongest supporters and lobbyinst for the nucler industry have assured the Congress that the nuclear industry needs as estimated $50 billion in loan guarantees over the next two years if they are to expand to meet our energy needs and build the proposed 28 new nuclear plants.

           Senator, Jeff Bingaman (D. NM) is the author of the energy bill claims the nuclear industry has no need of any loan guarantees except for “new technology”. Which of course none of this is relevant since the one sentence slipped into the bill really only needs the approval of the Energy Department for the nuclear industry to get every thing they want.

          This one little provision could also set the stage for billions of dollars in loan guarantees for the “clean coal” power plants. I recently blogged on the Clean coal alternative. Here is a quote, “The coal would be liquefied before using in the plants. Legislators seem to be blind to the fact that coal is filthy! To transform coal to a liquid fuel releases 4 to 8 per cent more global warming pollution than producing gasoline from oil. Besides that one ton of coal produces only two barrels of fuel! In addition to the carbon dioxide emitted while using the fuel, the production process creates almost a ton of carbon dioxide for every barrel of liquid fuel. Which is to say, one ton of coal in, more than two tons of carbon dioxide out.”

http://www.triadblogs.com/BrendaFayBowers/5659/How+and+Why+Coal+Has+Become+an+Alternative+Fuel.html

        You might want to read this entire article since it is almost a sure bet that it will be approved by both Houses with the nuclear “provision” in it. The global warming hype is getting everyone in Washington on board for an energy bill no matter how   flawed.  BB  

 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/31/washington/31nuclear.html?th&emc=th

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »